You are currently browsing the monthly archive for September 2007.
The idea, of course, behind the term “digital native” is that today’s youth have grown up with technology–they are native to it. Older people, on the other hand, are “immigrants” to technology; we’ve learned how to use it later in life.
Participants in the thread take both sides of the argument, with a good number sitting somewhere in the middle. I lean toward the “not” side. I do, of course, work with young children (8-9 years old), and I haven’t seen an “innate” ability to adapt to new technology applications. Even things like LeapPads are somewhat difficult to learn. Perhaps older children are more capable; perhaps my students will be more capable as they get older; perhaps what we’re doing in the classroom is developing their ability to learn. I can take a lot of positions!
I have, when working with adults, noticed that being able to use one application greatly reduces the learning curve for additional applications. I’m certain that this is by design–somewhere along the line the terms “save,” “print,” “copy,” and “paste” became standard. It’s difficult to think of too many synonyms for any of those words, and I’m glad that no one’s put forth the effort!
I suppose that if I was to put my thoughts into one simple phrase, I would say that (regardless of your age) most people can learn what is necessary to learn. That can be necessary as in, “I am interested in this and want to learn it,” or, “I need to learn this for my job/a grade/someone is requiring this of me. The former is much more likely to lead to success than the latter.
I check on the blog almost every day, but it’s a bit difficult to find time to post. Judging from a glance around the blogosphere, it looks like I’m not the only educator that’s a little bit busy as the new year gets rolling.
What’s going on in the classroom? My students have experimented with Tuxpaint and seem to really enjoy using it. I’m still looking for that first opportunity to use it for a project, but the comfort level seems to be there.
Our poems came out great on paper, and really look good as a .jpg when they’re put into Windows MovieMaker. Unfortunately, I’ve learned that WMM posts pics in “landscape only,” so our “portrait” pictures have large black areas to both sides. The audio didn’t go so well. Who’da thunk it, but third-graders are a bit microphone-shy. Getting a workable audio level is proving to be problematic with my simple setup. Cranking the gain in Audacity provides a proportionally large amount of background noise. I’m working on an inexpensive recording technique that’s workable.
On the non-tech side, we’ve been using the new Comprehension Toolkit with some success. It’s a bit slow for now, but it looks like it’s going to work well. I’m thinking about how students could “think” into different electronic documents. Typing speed could be the bottleneck there…