<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another discussion to keep an eye on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yetthereismethod.wordpress.com/2007/07/10/another-discussion-to-keep-an-eye-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yetthereismethod.wordpress.com/2007/07/10/another-discussion-to-keep-an-eye-on/</link>
	<description>Though this be madness, yet there is method in't.   - Polonius</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thirdgradeteacher</title>
		<link>http://yetthereismethod.wordpress.com/2007/07/10/another-discussion-to-keep-an-eye-on/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>thirdgradeteacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yetthereismethod.wordpress.com/2007/07/10/another-discussion-to-keep-an-eye-on/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>This is a great line, &quot;The constructivist approach, as I see (read about) it, is more popular at the beginning of the school year than it is as testing approaches.&quot;

To put it more bluntly: we allow students the time to make meaning and secure their understanding of a topic when we can, but then THE TEST comes and we throw our hands up, telling the students, &quot;Don&#039;t worry about understanding.  JUST DO THIS FOR THE TEST!!&quot; What a shame.

Good point, too, about the digital natives creating School 2.0 as they become teachers themselves.  One thing to consider: People tend to fall back on the familiar.  I fear that the digital natives, when some of them become teachers, will STILL have the temptation to teach the way they were taught, because it&#039;s the only form of instruction they will have seen (if we don&#039;t change things).  

At some point, enough teachers will need to have the boldness to depart from &quot;the way we&#039;ve always done things.&quot;  There&#039;s no guarantee that it will be us, or even them, who will get us to &quot;the tipping point&quot; where the way we do school makes a fundamental shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great line, &#8220;The constructivist approach, as I see (read about) it, is more popular at the beginning of the school year than it is as testing approaches.&#8221;</p>
<p>To put it more bluntly: we allow students the time to make meaning and secure their understanding of a topic when we can, but then THE TEST comes and we throw our hands up, telling the students, &#8220;Don&#8217;t worry about understanding.  JUST DO THIS FOR THE TEST!!&#8221; What a shame.</p>
<p>Good point, too, about the digital natives creating School 2.0 as they become teachers themselves.  One thing to consider: People tend to fall back on the familiar.  I fear that the digital natives, when some of them become teachers, will STILL have the temptation to teach the way they were taught, because it&#8217;s the only form of instruction they will have seen (if we don&#8217;t change things).  </p>
<p>At some point, enough teachers will need to have the boldness to depart from &#8220;the way we&#8217;ve always done things.&#8221;  There&#8217;s no guarantee that it will be us, or even them, who will get us to &#8220;the tipping point&#8221; where the way we do school makes a fundamental shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
